I agree with Ed's judgement about both Fossil watches he reviewed.
I wouldn't say all Fossils are bad, at least the Fossil Starck watches are very nice: (BTW sorry for the rakuten.co.jp links below, but the official Fossil photos are so crappy!)
I have a PH1002 (the classic Starck), very nice: stopwatch, timer, alarm, dual time, EL, all you need.
A newer version of it is the
beautiful PH2002.
Can't quite recommend the "Sand" PH1065: same features as above, but looks a bit cheap with its transparent case. They updated it later with chrome plating, PH1081, looks much better, but I didn't buy it.
For photos click here
Recently I purchased a PH1077, and it is perfect! Full dot matrix curved (!) mirror LCD, excellent readability, EL backlight, super stylish (IMHO).
It has only one drawback: the pseudo-analogue display mode isn't very clever: the hours hand advances only in full hour steps, so at a glance 5:59 looks like 5:00 (only the minute hand's position is different), making this display mode practically useless (not the similarities to the OLED watch...)
Some nice photos of the PH1077 are
here.
The FILA F1: I purchased one some time ago (NIB for 20GBP): overloaded with features and yes, the display is nice in good light, but not in dim light. I didn't really like it, but my father did - I gave it to him and he wears it almost every day (he's 67 and doesn't even know what hip-hop is
). Would a caucasian (white-skinned) hip-hopper wear a FILA? (in europe 'caucasian' means people of caucasus, I had to
look it up in a dictionary to understand
).
And if you want to know a
heavy watch, try the
o.d.m. MDD99:
238g
The
Fossil FS4291 looks promising (if one likes round shaped watches - I don't).
I have to stop here - enough new candidates for "Modern of the Month"