Seeker,
Below are a few comparison photos to show relative size. It's always hard to gauge size and heft by photographs without having the watches in hand, but it's the best we can do until we develop telepresence. Also, note the color differences - the gold filled P2s are a lemony yellow whereas the gold filled P3s and P4s are a rosy slightly coppery hue.
This is a bit of an overgeneralization, but generally stainless watches are slightly more sought after across the board because gold is rather out of fashion today.
This is speculation, but there may also be a generational component where each generation does its best to avoid the sorts of things that its parents might wear. At some point, that becomes cyclical and I've started to see an attraction to "retro" items in the younger generation.
Personally, I like both since I like to wear stainless with cool colors and gold with warmer colors. Brushed gold is rather less blingy than polished gold and I don't feel that any of the Pulsar models are too blingy. Also, I think historical context matters somewhat. In the 70s, gold was the thing so in some ways gold is fitting in a 70s watch where it might not be as fitting in a contemporary watch.
In an ideal world, it's nice to have a gold and a stainless sample of your very favorite designs, if possible.
-abe.
p.s. Sorry 'bout the P3. You'll get the next one!
DSC_4331 (800x1024).jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.