27 Oct 2013, 22:03
Actually, not so much of an aberration as you might think. This looks like a pretty standard module to me...I've seen the added 15Kohm resistors on a lot of 100-series modules (I'm guessing this was done at the factory, as a repair, to correct some issue with the switches). A final note; the Dress is NOT a P4...it lacks the signature feature of all P4 models...Auto-Command. It's not a P3 or P5, either (the claim that there is, or was, a P5 model has yet to be substantiated; the rare Special Edition Touch-Command Dress models with the Auto-Command feature might conceivably qualify as a P4, but this has never become part of the standard nomenclature). No, the Dress is a kind of "orphan" watch without a "P" designation...it's just a Dress.
As for modules running extraordinarily fast (or slow), it doesn't take as much of a frequency error as you might imagine to make a huge difference in the timekeeping accuracy, due to the relatively low frequency of the timekeeping signals. At 32.768KHz, an error of just 1Hz will translate into a timekeeping error of 2.64 seconds/day, or 963 seconds/year, and 22.7Hz off will create a deviation of a minute a day. The small cylindrical trimmer had a range of + or - 20sec/month, the larger one + or - 60sec/month, just enough to deal with about 100sec/month of error. Timekeeping was normally held to a tolerance of + or - 5sec/month, or roughly 2 parts/million (or .033Hz either way from the nominal crystal frequency). At 1sec/month, that's an error of only 0.0066Hz; not bad for a piece of commercial 1970's electronic technology. I've seen a few P2 and P3 modules that were still running even though my quartz monitor will only read an error of 200sec/month (6.4sec/day)...after that it just tells me it's "overrange", so I can't say with certainty how far the quartz can drift before it just quits oscillating.