John,
An interesting question. I think it depends upon how highly you value scarcity and branding or if you are smitten by the blingy chunky styling.
From a quality and construction point of view, there is nothing special about the TC-1/TC-2 over an equivalent Hamilton or Pulsar. As you know, they were built by the same companies in the same factories and to the same specs - modules by Time Computer, bracelets by Champion, cases by Star Watch Case, all in Lancaster, PA. The GF cases are all 80 micron, the bracelets are identical between the TC-1/TC-2 and Hamilton QED except for a groove down the center of each link on the Hamiltons. A Hamilton QED and a TC-1 feel pretty similar on the wrist.
From design perspective, I still prefer the more elegant lines of the Hamiltons and the more futuristic styling of the Pulsar models. For a while I wore a TC-1 and I currently have a TC-2. The Omega models are fun to wear once in a while if you like chunky, blingy watches. They sit a bit higher on the wrist and feel a bit like wearing a little gold block strapped to your wrist. However, they lack the grace and elegance of either the Pulsar or Hamilton models in my opinion and it feels like the designers phoned it in on the Omegas.
However, they are iconic as Omega's first digitals and they are blingy and chunky if you like that sort of thing. It's easy to become smitten by a watch for lesser and more ridiculous reasons, so I imagine that they will be worth it for some. I still sort of covet the white GF TC models.
I voted 'no' but I can imagine someone voting 'yes'. I don't think any of us would claim that this obsession we share is logical.
-abe.