31 Jan 2006, 17:08
In my eyes patents do not prove anything, they prove that some clever guy has brought an idea to the patent office.
Good example would be ebays "Buy it now" button which had been patented in 1995 and ebay had to pay a lot of money.
Personally I doubt that there were no "buy" buttons before 1995.
If it proves one thing than that Roger was too lazy to go to the patent office (That stuff also costs loads of money which Roger barely had). He could have at least the first solar-powered wristwatch patented, or the first digital wristwatch with alarm or automatic calendar or whatever. I think he just didnt have money and time to fight about patents and titles.
Dont forget he was a one man army - one man developing and manufacturing a watch with tech that was ages ahead of its time. Pulsar had an army of lawyers, engineers, marketing specialists, etc. They had Hamiltons experience in researching, marketing, selling, etc.
I believe if Roger did have the money and manpower like Pulsar then it would have been the Synchronar on the Carson show that was announced as the first digital watch and it would not only have been the first digital, it would also have been the first solar-powered watch.
If Roger was missing something, then it was luck and money.
I really dont want to saw off a leg of your P-1 throne, I just think Roger Riehl was the best watch inventor of his time, probably of all times. I am well aware that even if some proofs come up, then about noone here would accept them - but for me just personally it would mean a lot, maybe a bit of the respect that this great man deserved.