Phew, repairing the watch is hard enough Howard, but keeping up with your strange ideas about what I have done to you, your father, and my watch is almost impossible.
Synchroserious wrote:If you continue to break the seal like you did when you made modifications where the band joins,
I admit that I had to scrape down the thickness of the ledge between the two "horns" at the back of the plastic shell, in order to make the band move freely, and that the knife thereby made scratches in the main body. These scratches were however superficial and did not bother me at all. Lexan is a very tough material, it will not crack because of superficial scractches. As for the joint between the upper and lower shell half, it showed no signs of breakage before I sent the watch back, no signs thereof when I got it back, and still no signs could be seen when I milled through that area yesterday.
Synchroserious wrote: it might just open up and then more will be known.I honestly believe yours has more bubbles than ANY I have ever seen
It managed to pass all the quality checks with them.
Synchroserious wrote: and therfore formed and must have entered while you were testing to see at which pressure the batteries would give.
If I understand you correctly, you want to tell me that since the watch has a record breaking number of bubbles, I must have caused when I, according to you, exercised destructive testing on my almost brand new watch. Well, even if we disregard the fact that the watch is filled with a 2-component rubber which is fully cured long before the watch is delivered, making it impossible to add new bubbles later on, and even if we disregard the fact that I would have to buy/build special equipment in order to produce the pressures necessary to bust the batteries, doesn't it still sound pretty far-fetched, even to you, that someone would buy a watch for several 100 EUR, wait for it over three years, only to spoil it with a destructive battery busting test as soon as he gets his hands on it? On top of that, invest another x hundred EUR in equipment to repair it again?
Apart from from these considerations, don't you think it is strange that managed to use the watch for almost a year after I, according to you, busted the batteries?
Synchroserious wrote: So if you are asking me,it is highly probable that new batteries would be in order along with the QC I sent.
Don't hold your breath Howard. Despite your impressive powers of observation and deduction, I think I will rely on my own facilities.
Synchroserious wrote: After a thourough cleaning inside and replacing these two parts I would almost bet it will come back.
Do you really think I would like to send it back, after all that happened? I almost lost it. I had to "negotiate" ad nauseum with you before it was released. It came back with deep poke marks from an overzealous user of a soldering pen, marks that I explicitly had asked you not to make. (Remember? I asked you to mark the points with a felt tipped pen on top of office tape stuck to the surface, but no, no, jab, jab, melt, melt was obviously more fun.) On top of that, all kinds of strange theories about what kinds of torture I have exposed the watch to.
Yes, it may be true that you helped your father repairing these watches for several years. Yes, it may be true you have inspected my watch through a stereo microscope. Still, you have an almost supernatural knack for mis-interpreting production artefacts as signs of malicious, or least mindboggling stupid, abuse.
I'd rather send the watch to my mother for a repair.
------------------------------------
Now that I am finished with you Howard, for this time at least, here comes a follow up on this thread for the rest of readers of this forum:
As I came home from work, there were no rubyred, happy digits greeting me as I actuated the sliders. Bummer. I have now dug up a downloaded instruction sheet that states the charging times for the watch when it is exposed to different sources of light.
They look delightfully long.
With some luck, it is still too early to count the watch out. After all, it has only received about 3h sunshine, with clouds, through a window pane, 10h of, eh, "cloudshine", and some 5h of electric light.