What models optimal for thin wrists (6.5" to 6.75"

[monologuist]

Either vintage or contemporary models for men....

I don't mind the look of a watch that is a little oversized, as long as it doesn't look ridiculous or the band simply doesn't fit.

I have unusually skinny wrists, around 6.5 to 6.75" I'd say, although I'm not particularly skinny overall. (I'm probably 5'10" 165-170 lbs.)
In fact my arms aren't particularly skinny either, just my wrists!

[bucko170]

With regard to your previous listing.
IMHO I would consider the Pulsar sport to be a good choice, it is not too big and it's nice, neat and compact, it has a fully adjustable band with removable links and it also has that all important original 70s feel.

[monologuist]

With regard to your previous listing.
IMHO I would consider the Pulsar sport to be a good choice, it is not too big and it's nice, neat and compact, it has a fully adjustable band with removable links and it also has that all important original 70s feel.

OK..very helpful...do you think the asking price of 595$US is reasonable for a NOS Pulsar Sport? Or am I going to be able to find a much better deal on Ebay or the like?

Outside of models I inquired about in my other post, are there any other ones that would be similar in stature to the Pulsar Sport?

[bucko170]

In my humble opinion I would rate the Pulsar sport as the best watch from your list (I have one) followed by the Commodore which I also have.
My modern watch choice would be the Majestyk M-II: although this is quite a big watch and may not be a good choice for a first watch if you are concerned about the size.
I am sure that other forum members will have a say, some may agree with me others may have a different view. I would advise you to take a little time and consider all opinions before deciding, although the most important opinion will be that of your own.

[bucko170]

Sorry I forgot to mention - the price I paid for the Pulsar sport was $360 including postage and packaging to the UK, this was purchased on the 16th Feb 2007.

I will have a look for the seller and post it here if I find it.

Found it - The seller was Barbie9, who sold quite a few of these watches, although I did read a post saying that his\her supplies where running thin and they where down to the last few.

[monologuist]

Sorry I forgot to mention - the price I paid for the Pulsar sport was $360 including postage and packaging to the UK, this was purchased on the 16th Feb 2007.

I will have a look for the seller and post it here if I find it.

Found it - The seller was Barbie9, who sold quite a few of these watches, although I did read a post saying that his\her supplies where running thin and they where down to the last few.

360$ ? That seems like a great price. Unfortunately, I did a search and it doesn't seem like they are selling them anymore. If anyone knows otherwise please let me know!


I really like the look of the Pulsar Sport in pictures at least....some questions about this model:
1.How would you rate the "fit and finish" of this watch compared to competing vintage models?
2. How about compared to something like the Majestyk?
3. Also how durable is the glass on it?
4. How heavy is it relatively speaking?
5. How thick is it ?
6. With a NOS watch like this, should I be concerned that a watch that old that has been sitting unused would be fragile or degrade quickly or it practically like buying one back in the day?
6. Would I be stupid to pay 595$ for one?!

[monologuist]

In my humble opinion I would rate the Pulsar sport as the best watch from your list (I have one) followed by the Commodore which I also have.
My modern watch choice would be the Majestyk M-II: although this is quite a big watch and may not be a good choice for a first watch if you are concerned about the size.
I am sure that other forum members will have a say, some may agree with me others may have a different view. I would advise you to take a little time and consider all opinions before deciding, although the most important opinion will be that of your own.

Can you give me a relative comparison of size between the Pulsar Sport and the Majestyk MII?
Can the band on the Majestyk be adjusted to fit a thinner wrist like mine?
Or are you more saying that the case may just look garish on a thinner wrist?
Other than size, price, and "vintage cool" factors, what would you say are any pros and cons between these 2 models?

[bucko170]

Let me try and answer some of your questions.
1. I would say that the quality and fit of the the watch is very good, Pulsar's where on the whole renown for their quality.
2. Unfortunately I do not have a Majestyk to compare the Pulsar to in order to give you a size comparison.
3. I always take care when wearing the Pulsar, as I do a lot of my watches, I have some watches that I consider as daily wear, this one is more for the special occasion. It has a plastic lens rather than glass, this is quite common for these watches. The lens does not protrude above the case so it should be better protected from scratches. Mine is still as new after 2 years.
4. I would say it is average weight - although I am sure I have seen a listing which gives the actual weight of the watch. I sure someone on the forum will be able to give you the actual weight of the watch.
5. The watch thickness, measured to the best of my ability is 10mm it also measures 40mm lug to lug (total length) and 32mm across.
6. I think this watch is as good now as it was then.
7. I personally wouldn't consider $595 an excessive price.

Although I do not own a Majestyk I would be highly surprised if the band was not adjustable.

The Majestyk is a nice watch and there are members on the forum who are avid fans, I am in no way knocking the Majestyk, but you mentioned the size as being a factor. Although I do not have exact sizes I know that the Majestyk is quite a big timepiece so if you are looking for a moderately small timepiece it may not be the watch for you. Personally I like 'chunky' watches and I think the Majestyk would look equally as good on a small wrist as it would a large wrist but I didn't want to mislead you with the size. I am sure another forum member will be able to give you the exact dimensions of the watch so you can make a comparison.

I think the two watches are on equal footing as far as reliability and durability etc are concerned, although you would probably get a guarantee with the Majestyk.

There is a write up on the Majestyk here, also shows the watch alongside other watches to give an idea of the size of the watch.

http://www.dwf.nu/viewtopic.php?t=1719& ... ze&start=0

Hope this helps.

[monologuist]

Let me try and answer some of your questions.
1. I would say that the quality and fit of the the watch is very good, Pulsar's where on the whole renown for their quality.
2. Unfortunately I do not have a Majestyk to compare the Pulsar to in order to give you a size comparison.
3. I always take care when wearing the Pulsar, as I do a lot of my watches, I have some watches that I consider as daily wear, this one is more for the special occasion. It has a plastic lens rather than glass, this is quite common for these watches. The lens does not protrude above the case so it should be better protected from scratches. Mine is still as new after 2 years.
4. I would say it is average weight - although I am sure I have seen a listing which gives the actual weight of the watch. I sure someone on the forum will be able to give you the actual weight of the watch.
5. The watch thickness, measured to the best of my ability is 10mm it also measures 40mm lug to lug (total length) and 32mm across.
6. I think this watch is as good now as it was then.
7. I personally wouldn't consider $595 an excessive price.

Although I do not own a Majestyk I would be highly surprised if the band was not adjustable.

The Majestyk is a nice watch and there are members on the forum who are avid fans, I am in no way knocking the Majestyk, but you mentioned the size as being a factor. Although I do not have exact sizes I know that the Majestyk is quite a big timepiece so if you are looking for a moderately small timepiece it may not be the watch for you. Personally I like 'chunky' watches and I think the Majestyk would look equally as good on a small wrist as it would a large wrist but I didn't want to mislead you with the size. I am sure another forum member will be able to give you the exact dimensions of the watch so you can make a comparison.

I think the two watches are on equal footing as far as reliability and durability etc are concerned, although you would probably get a guarantee with the Majestyk.

There is a write up on the Majestyk here, also shows the watch alongside other watches to give an idea of the size of the watch.

http://www.dwf.nu/viewtopic.php?t=1719& ... ze&start=0

Hope this helps.

Hey thanks so much for taking the time to respond. The Pulsar Sports sounds really appealing. The only concern right now would be the price....For nearly 600$, it seems that I'd have quite a wide range of watches available to choose from, so I just have to gauge whether there may be an even better model suited for my purposes. I will probabl end up wearing this as an everyday watch if it is really as "indestructable" as it is reputed to be.

Wish that ebay retailer was still around; for 350$ I'd do it for sure.

Do you lke the Commodore BTW?

[bucko170]

Love the commodore, although it has a large crystal which is quite easy to scratch if used as a daily wear and it is not as sort after as the Pulsar, this does however make it a much cheaper alternative and it is available on ebay as a BIN right now.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 26_fvi%3D1

I found an old ebay listing for the Majestyk which states the size as -
The case is 35MM High (not counting the two built in links) & 45MM Long.......
It also can be used to display in 12 or 24 hour format, where as the Pulsar is standard 12 hour only.

[bucko170]

Sorry had to make a fresh post, I wasn't able to edit the last after I previewed it.
I was going to add that the Majestyk has a glass 'scratch resistant' crystal.
But the seller recommended that it used on a wrist size of 6.5" plus, see listing number 150313811952 for details.

I have sent you a PM with some contact details.

[charger105]

Hi monologuist.
In my opinion, the majestyk is a marvelous watch, manufactured by a forum member 'Majestyk'. I'm pretty sure it comes with a 3 year warranty, which you can bank on.......he is thoroughly trustworthy in my dealings. However it is large. PM him and have a chat.

I have very small wrists, and really like my Pulsar P3. If you take a few links out and adjust the clasp, it site perfectly on the wrist. You should be able to get a good one for around $200-$400. If you do decide to go with the Sport, I suggest waiting......$600 seems a lot to me.

Rgds,
Andrew.

[monologuist]

Hi monologuist.
In my opinion, the majestyk is a marvelous watch, manufactured by a forum member 'Majestyk'. I'm pretty sure it comes with a 3 year warranty, which you can bank on.......he is thoroughly trustworthy in my dealings. However it is large. PM him and have a chat.

I have very small wrists, and really like my Pulsar P3. If you take a few links out and adjust the clasp, it site perfectly on the wrist. You should be able to get a good one for around $200-$400. If you do decide to go with the Sport, I suggest waiting......$600 seems a lot to me.

Rgds,
Andrew.

And where can I procure a P3?

I had gathered that the Majestyk is somewhat large..I wish I could see it side by side with the Pulsar Sport, but it seems everyone is warning me away from that one.